“It’s just a bad cover shot of her, her face does look changed, so unless it’s a weird angle they caught her from, it was done in post production. It just makes me mad, because you can look at any paparazzi candid or red carpet shot, and this woman is gorgeous, needs NO messing with her face!” commented Miss Dalloway.
“My thoughts exactly. Most of the paparazzi pics of Emily are much better than this,” replied Nymphaea.
Tinsley V shared the same sentiments: “Yikes. This makeup is very wrong for her. I think that’s what’s giving off this overly Photoshopped vibe. She has a slightly larger mouth and nose which are more exaggerated by the bold lip … the light eye makeup draws even more attention to the bottom half of the face and then the eyebrows are too heavy.”
“Oh my, she looks like two different people from the cover to the editorial. In love with that landscape shot of her in green. The colour palette is certainly fresh and a nice change from all the dowdy covers we’ve been seeing lately, but that is not a good angle/post-production work,” agreed Cosmic Voices.
However, not everyone agrees. Forum member ohmycolin enthused, “This cover is sosososososo gorgeous, I absolutely adore the colour scheme, nice and a fresh and airy and summery and Emily looks radiant!”
Check out the thread for previews of Emily’s cover story and join the discussion here.
