IMAGE: VOGUE.GLOBO.COM
“Her best cover, very nice easygoing energy, she is not trying too hard, and has a lovely smile. Gorgeous cover,” an amazed Miss Dalloway applauded straight away.
“She looks great, much better when she smiles,” agreed zacatecas570.
Forum member guimon shared the same positive attitude, echoing, “Stunning. She looks so fresh and vibrant. Very commercial cover, I really like it.”
“This is a very lovely cover. I do wish they shot with an amazing outdoor location rather than in the studio,” confessed Mody, as the tone of the thread started to slip.
In the same frame of mind was MON: “She looks beautiful that’s certainly undeniable and she looks alive and rather excited… but everything else beyond that is wrong! The cropping of the photo and that hair (need I mention?). The overall vibe of the photo would have been perfect for an outdoor shoot (windblown).”
Soon after, things began to get ugly. “Is it a Vogue cover? The cover looks like Cosmopolitan or InStyle but not Vogue…” complained a horrified narcyza.
“Totally agree with you, looks like a Seventeen cover,” responded burbuja8910, adding fuel to the fire.
We certainly are a divided bunch. Whose side are you on? State your opinion here.
